Where the Wind Comes Sweeping Down the Plain: Monet in Oklahoma

May in Tulsa, Oklahoma. The temperatures were in the 80s, but the wind was so vigorous and dry that it felt much cooler. My mission was to observe the uncrating and hanging of the Mead’s precious Monet painting, Morning on the Seine, Giverny, which is part of an exciting exhibition called Monet and the Seine: Impressions of a River at the Philbrook Museum of Art, Tulsa, and the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston.

Claude Monet (French 1840-1926), Morning on the Seine, Giverny (Matinée sur la Seine), 1897, oil on canvas ,Bequest of Miss Susan Dwight Bliss ,AC 1966.48

Claude Monet (French 1840–1926), Morning on the Seine, Giverny (Matinée sur la Seine), 1897. Bequest of Miss Susan Dwight Bliss, AC 1966.48

I arrived in the morning with the courier from the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. We were among the first to have our paintings placed on the wall. Usually a courier doesn’t get to see the finished product. But this time, I watched while staff at the Philbrook carefully unpacked the painting and installed it masterfully in no time.

The MFA Boston Monet was hung next to the Mead’s. I was quite impressed with the space separating the paintings, so impressed that I wrote down the measurements: 4 feet,  6 inches. This seemed genius to me. No doubt there would be crowds, and each painting is given almost 9 feet of linear wall space to allow for a moment of singular contemplation.

The Mead's Monet awaits installation at the Phillbrook alongside the MFA Boston Monet.

The Mead’s Monet (right) alongside the MFA Boston’s Morning on the Seine, Giverny, 1897. Gift of Mrs. W. Scott Fitz, 11.1261

2014-06-16 16.21.18

The two Mornings on the Seine from 1897, reunited in the exhibition Monet and the Seine: Impressions of a River.


Some background about the exhibition might be enlightening. The exhibition at the Philbrook specifically focused on Monet’s Mornings on the Seine series. This group of 28 paintings had been exhibited only once before — by Monet in June of 1898. Although the original exhibition was critically acclaimed, the Mornings series was never shown together again. Thanks to the Philbrook and the MFA Houston, 16 of the original masterpieces from all over the world were brought together once again.

The Philbrook Museum of Art in Tulsa, Oklahoma

The Philbrook Museum of Art in Tulsa, Oklahoma

After our Monet was safe and secure on the wall, I was able to tour the Philbrook.  I had no idea that such a gem existed in Tulsa. Do not pass up a chance to visit this art museum. The spectacular gardens aside, they have strong European, American, and Native American collections. I fell in love with three paintings.


Vittore Carpaccio (Venetian, 1465–1526), St. Stephen, ca. 1505–1514. Gift of the Samuel H. Kress Foundation, 1961.9.13





Vittore Carpaccio’s St. Stephen, from ca. 1514. I love the rocks glued to his head and shoulder (see detail).

Thomas Moran (American, 1837-1926), Grand Canyon, 1907

Thomas Moran (American, 1837–1926), Grand Canyon, 1907. Gift of Laura A. Clubb, 1947.8.26

Thomas Moran’s awesome Grand Canyon from 1907. He left no color off the canvas.

2014-09-23 10.29.32

Byam Shaw (British, 1872–1919), Beatrice, ca. 1905. Gift of Laura A. Clubb, 1947.8.6

2014-09-23 10.31.10

And Beatrice, ca. 1905, by Byam Shaw. No photo I could take would do this Pre-Raphaelite–inspired painting justice. For me, the actual mother of pearl, gold, gesso, and beads that decorate the surface are entrancing, but the architectural frame won me over from fifty feet away.


Vittore Carpaccio (Venetian, ca. 1465–1526), St. Peter Martyr of Verona, ca. 1505–1514. Gift of the Samuel H. Kress Foundation, 1961.9.11


An honorable mention was the companion painting to St. Stephen: Carpaccio’s St. Peter Martyr of Verona (ca. 1505–1514). How could anyone not appreciate the skillful placement of daggers, the symbol of his martyrdom?

Written by Stephen Fisher, collections manager at the Mead Art Museum.

Where Art and Science Meet


On display at the Mead Art Museum

Art and science are two different streams which rise from the same creative source and flow into the same ocean of the common culture, but the currents of these two streams flow in different beds.” Naum Gabo

People like to think of art and science as opposites. Art is traditionally regarded as the representation of forms, while science is the medium for building knowledge about the functions and forms of the universe. Scientists exist in the world of laws, ideas, and experiments, and artists lay claim to creative expression and exploration of the representation of forms, feelings, and moments in time. But art and science are also connected, and Constructivist art in the twentieth century developed this connection in innovative and significant ways.

In the essay “Art and the Scientist” J. D. Bernal argues that the modern art movement was connected to and stimulated by scientific and mathematical discoveries through a study of the forms that Constructivist artists in particular developed. Naum Gabo (1890–1977), Barbara Hepworth (1903–1975), and Henry Moore (1898–1986) are some of the artists from this period whose work expresses this connection between art and science. Without the influence of scientific and mathematical ideas of the time, their art — and sculpture in particular — would not have marked a groundbreaking change in modern art. The works of art by these artists currently on display at the Mead are examples of this influence and connection.


On holilday at Happisburgh, Norfolk, 1931: (left to right) Ivon Hitchens, Irina Moore, Henry Moore, Barbara Hepworth, Ben Nicholson and Mary Jenkins, whose husband Douglas took the picture.

Gabo, Hepworth, and Moore were friends who frequently worked together and shared ideas about art and sculpture. As a result of their personal relationships and the fact that they were all making art in the same period, their works explored similar forms and concepts of space and expressing movement. A recent reinstallation of the Mead’s galleries placed related works by these artists together: Gabo’s Vertical Construction No. 2, Hepworth’s Project for Wood and Strings, Trezion II, and Moore’s Stringed Figure. What they have in common is the interplay of interior and exterior spaces and the way this relationship parallels the mathematical concept of negative curvature.


Naum Gabo (American, 1890-1977), Vertical Construction No.2 (The Waterfall),1965-66, bronze with stainless steel spring wire, Gift of the Julia A. Whitney Foundation, AC 2001.600

Gabo’s study of mathematical models resulted in sculptures that explore relationships between space, structure, and natural rhythms and forms. In Vertical Construction No. 2, which is attached to a slowly rotating motor, an inner space is cut out from curvilinear planes of metal, and metallic strings create tension between the core and the exterior.


Barbara Hepworth (British, 1903-1975), Project for Wood and Strings, Trezion II, 1959, oil, gesso, pencil on board, Gift of Richard S. Zeisler, AC 1960.1

The drawing by Hepworth, Project for Wood and Strings, Trezion II, probably a preparatory sketch for a sculpture, creates a tension between spaces similar to Gabo’s. Hepworth in particular was fascinated by the idea of piercing space in her sculptures, and in this drawing creates an interior surface with a web of thin, intersecting lines that are accentuated by the smear of bright blue in the center. Whereas Gabo’s sculpture emphasizes separation of space using metallic surfaces, Hepworth employs color. Hepworth’s thin lines are related to the wires that Gabo uses to connect each part of the sculpture, and they serve to express the unity of interior and exterior surfaces and the complex curves present in nature.


Henry Moore (British, 1898-1986), Stringed Figure, designed 1938, cast 1960, bronze, Gift of Bertram H. Bloch, Class of 1933, AC 1972.55

The use of curvature and strings cutting across different planes is also embodied in Moore’s sculpture Stringed Figure. In Circle, the important 1937 art book that Moore, Gabo, and Hepworth all contributed to, Moore states that sculpture is the best medium to attempt freely “the exploration of the world of pure form” (Circle 118). Moore, like Gabo, was fascinated by mathematical models and this interest informed his sculptures. The white strings that meet in the middle of the arc and pull together the two curving sides, create a taut connection between the gaping interior space and the polished exterior. Undulating planes in the sculpture’s interior generate interplay between light and shadow that recalls the natural forms Moore wanted to convey in his art.

Written by Catherine Rose O’Brien, Class of 2017


Image sources: 1/2/3/4

From the Collection: Works by Vadim Sidur



This simple, yet elegant drawing by Russian artist Vadim Sidur joined the collection in 2001. Sidur specialized in monumental sculpture during the last Stalinist years. He was going to participate in the re-building of Moscow after World War II, but Stalin died in 1953, and in the mid-1950s Sidur abandoned the Socialist Realist vocabulary that would form the style of the postwar revisions. The officials regarded his non-canonical art as formalist and pacifist, and therefore prevented him from exhibiting in Russia. Despite this prohibition, Sidur never left his native country.


Sidur began making drawings after suffering a heart attack in 1961. In the work above, titled Faces, he achieved a quality of sculptural volume on a flat surface. The monumentality and dynamism of ancient sculpture, which had fascinated Sidur since childhood, resonates. Perhaps because of his two encounters with death (the other, during WW II) his work typically addressed existential questions about life, death, and family. The three people represented here are graphically linked, symbolizing the need for human support within a hostile social and political environment.

image sources: 1 / 2